On Jun 13, David Dyer-Bennet said: >Matthew Hunter <matthew at infodancer.org> writes: > >> >From an interface perspective I prefer the former; but from a >> technical perspective I prefer the latter. >> >> What I REALLY want is "reply to list", which mutt provides, if >> you take the time to specify the posting address of every list to >> which you subscribe. For various reasons[1] I find this >> insufficient. > >Mutt won't recognize the "List-post:" header? (RFC 2369) It's expecting that header per RFC 1149: http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ -- Rachael From the Dilbert Newsletter: Lininger "You should talk to her. rachael@ She is a minefield of information." daedala.net