Question about "Replying"

Rachael Lininger rachael at daedala.net
Thu Jun 13 17:55:42 PDT 2002

On Jun 13, David Dyer-Bennet said:
>Matthew Hunter <matthew at infodancer.org> writes:
>> >From an interface perspective I prefer the former; but from a
>> technical perspective I prefer the latter.
>> What I REALLY want is "reply to list", which mutt provides, if
>> you take the time to specify the posting address of every list to
>> which you subscribe.  For various reasons[1] I find this
>> insufficient.
>Mutt won't recognize the "List-post:" header? (RFC 2369) 

It's expecting that header per RFC 1149:


Rachael             From the Dilbert Newsletter:
   Lininger              "You should talk to her. 
     rachael@                   She is a minefield of information."