Kragar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Bearson [mailto:jbearson at tampabay.rr.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 15:34
> To: dragaera at dragaera.info
> Subject: Re: Kragar
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan" <alan at 5sc.net>
> To: "Dragaera" <dragaera at dragaera.info>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:38 PM
> Subject: RE: Kragar
>
>
> >
> > > At 02:43 PM 7/10/2002 -0400, Alan wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > It is my recollection that Steve has also said the following:
> > > > > > > o We have met Mario in the Vlad books.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I've never seen that.  I've seen a hint or statement that
> > > when Aliera is
> > > > > >really happy in _Jhereg_ Mario has just left, so we've almost
> > > > > seen him, but
> > > > > >not a "we've met Mario" statement.
> > > > >
> > > > > That is correct.
> > > > >
> > > >All three ?
> > >
> > > The portion I quoted.
> >
> > Sorry for the tersely phrased interrogative.  Here is what I should have
> > asked:
> >
> > Underneath one short sentence that was followed by a long sentence that
> took
> > up three lines, and proposed two separate but related guesses was your
> > reply.
> > "That is correct," I took to possibly mean that the the entire
> sentence is
> > correct.  This would mean that Mario HAD just left Aliera.  This is the
> > clarification
> > that I was looking for.
> >
> > Alan
> >
>
> I'm pretty sure he meant that the one section he quoted is the one that is
> correct. We have *almost* met Mario
>

It was quoted before he replied to it.