> books at bofh.com wrote: > >>>I would interpret the 'no one is no one else' statement to mean that > >>>there are not two major characters who are one individual, not that > >>>we've never met a major character in disguise. > >> > > > >>This does not rule out Sethra (my guess). > > > > > > Well, if the narrator of FYA can be trusted somewhat, this can't be, > > as Sethra and Mario were in the throne room at the same time. > > > > Firstly I very much doubt that Mario is Sethra, but for the sake of > argument:) > > > If Mario and Sethra were in the throne room at the same time and > Sethra is Mario , > > It logically follows that MarioSethra can be in two different places at > the same time. > > Now this is where I get vauge, but I seem to remember that being in two > diffenent places at the same time is considered as one of the defining > characteristics of being a God( cant remember where I read that , and > it could be completely incorrect :(, anyone confirm? ). > > So it follows then that Sethra would be a God:) > Ok, I'll go along with Verra being Sethra too. *G* Look, whacked theories are what chairs and beer were invented FOR ! Alan