In a message dated Thu, 1 Aug 2002 9:18:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, Mia McDavid <mia_mcdavid at attbi.com> writes: > I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I don't have any > evidence--I don't think there *is* much evidence one way or > another--but I don't think the weapon that can be called > Godslayer did exist before. After all, there's such things > as precognition and prophecy, aren't there? The Serioli > that recognized that Spellbreaker was part of a great > weapon-to-be may not have known when it would be completed, > but he recognized what it was intended for. That is all > that is necessary. But that Serioli aslo said that an attempt was made to destroy Godslayer [page 112 pb]. Why would he speak in the past tense if Godslayer has never been in one piece to date? --KG