Dragaera

Why doesn't anybody *win*?

FelixEisen at aol.com FelixEisen at aol.com
Sat Sep 7 02:58:22 PDT 2002

In a message dated 9/6/2002 4:41:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, scs at di.org 
writes:
> The impression I worked from is that Sethra Lavode has already advised
> Sethra the Younger that this isn't particularly useful, but the Younger
> has decided to go ahead anyway.  If she's unable to learn from advice
> and wants to bang her head against the wall, let her.  She'll be the one
> who pays the political and personal cost.

This last part is, so far as I can tell, the primary reason that in 200,000 
years the East has never been fully conquered by the Empire -- politics.  I 
haven't re-read the two Khaavren romances in a month or two, but my 
impression from them -- specifically from FHA -- is that the Empire's army 
gets shifted around at the whim of politics.  It IS limited in size, after 
all, and the Empire seems to be large enough (and pugnacious enough) to have 
recurring enemies on every side, as well as have the 'occasional' internal 
trouble.  In addition, remember that Fenario -- which is, I'm still 
convinced, the Pepperfields (see postscript) -- is only one of many different 
'Easterner' lands.

All of this means that getting the Might of the Empire together to totally 
conquer the Easterners would be an exercise for ... for ... hmmm.  Good 
question.  Quite possibly only a Phoenix, an Issola, or a Yendi would be able 
to get all the nobles working in the same direction on that one.  Certainly 
Tortaalik has enough problems getting the Princes together just to hammer out 
a budget...

Then again, even if the Empire HAD conquered the East, how would we know?  
It's only that nobody's mentioned it.  I have the growing impression that 
Sethra Lavode Knows Something about the Easterners that Sethra the Younger 
does not -- and that the various Easterner kingdoms are ready and waiting for 
an Imperial attack.


Felix Eisen


P.S. -- Pepperfields/Fenario.  Different people, different traditions, 
different names.  Fenario was 'named' after Fenarr, who (a thousand years 
ago) forced a treaty with Kav the Elf by holding him at swordspoint -- said 
sword being filled with the Power of Faerie (tm).  Bolk (aka 'Wisdom') did 
the whole mystic trust thing, yadda yadda -- we know the Brokedown Palace 
story, right?  Remember also that the pass between Faerie and Fenario is 
narrow and difficult; this seems to be a prime sticking point for lots of 
people, who point out that there is no such difficulty between the Empire and 
the Pepperfields.

Pardon my French, but bullshit.

To these people, I refer you to the description of the passages into the 
Pepperfields -- one where the amazingly crooked bridge is, where many battles 
between the Empire and the Easterners have occurred, and the other that is 
suggested by a comment about the 'direct climb' which is apparently so steep 
and perilous it cannot be used by horses.  As well, the Pepperfields are 
wanted by Fenarr (and his army of Easterners) simply to live in and farm, a 
political state that Khaavren and the rest seem to be at ease with.

To sum up: the Fenarians consider themselves to be independent, but have a 
1,000 year old peace treaty with Faerie, enabling them to live in comparative 
peace and prosperity.  The Empire consider the Pepperfields to be their own 
territory, albeit used by a group of Easterners who haven't sworn alliegence 
to a noble -- but if they were, they'd be under the dominion of that realm's 
Baron (or whatever).  Fenario IS the Pepperfields, believed by both sides to 
be owned by themselves, but 'under treaty' with the others.  No muss, no 
fuss, no invasion.  No problem.