Gametech wrote: > David Dyer-Bennet wrote: >> "Gametech" <voltronalpha at hotmail.com> writes: >> >>> Karin Bassett wrote: >>>> --- Claire Rojstaczer <ambyrglow at softhome.net> wrote: >>>>>> David Dyer-Bennet writes: >>>>>> "Peter H. Granzeau" <pgranzeau at cox.net> writes: >>>>>> > Does anyone know why Tor has seemingly abandoned their Web >>>>>> site? I > notice the last time anyone seems to have maintained >>>>>> it was in > mid-summer; the publishing schedule ends in August, >>>>>> 2002 (three months > ago). >>>>>> I think it comes down to "because it's a low-priority job for >>>>>> people (pnh mostly I think) with many other >>>>> responsibilities". >>>>>> >>>>>> They could probably hire a teenager once a month to do updates >>>>>> and pay him in pizza... >>>>>> >>>>>> rone >>>>> >>>>> Or chocolate. Chocolate is good. I'd probably do >>>>> it for chocolate. . . . >>>> >>>> I'll do it for chocolate, how much are we talking >>>> here? >>>> (I'll do a lot for dark chocolate.) >> >>> I was wondering why I've found only a few contracts lately, everyone >>> in my field is willing to 'work for food' Hmph There I go again >>> thinking people get paid to do web work. Seriously though If I had >>> to make a guess I'd say whomever it is who usually would take care >>> of web things doesn't do that work anymore, hasn't thought about it >>> in a really long time, or a combination of both. Sometimes when a >>> employee leaves a company they take with them the knowledge of how >>> to access the companies webserver which is more often than not 'out >>> of house' >> >> It says in the FAQ who the people are (Patrick and Teresa), and >> they're still there. And the schedule got updated recently, and now >> stretches out into the future (up through August 2003 I believe) >> again. > My first thought is well so much for that theory and second I wonder if they got paid with comestibles.