> -----Original Message----- > From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:dd-b at dd-b.net] > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 1:47 PM > To: dragaera at dragaera.info > Subject: Re: Straw Poll about "Reply-to" (was: Damiano's Lute) > > > Tucker <jazzfish at softhome.net> writes: > > > I'm a fan, but Eudora allows me to "Reply to all" and delete the > > sender's address so that it goes to the list. I've not seen a > > "Reply-to-list" list where "Reply to all" will catch both > the sender > > and the list addresses. > > > > (Of course, having said that, I nearly sent this off-list.) > > It's been suggested that mail clients implement "reply to > sender" as yet another workaround. However, the easiest > solution is simply to implement the RFC defining message > headers giving posting, subscribe, and unsubscribe addresses. > I know Pegasus mail imlements that one, for example. Then > you can click on a button to do the precise thing you want. Hmm. This appears to answer a question that I asked Rick (which makes me wish I had seen it earlier, but somehow I missed it...probably too busy harassing Rick. :) ). So there is a RFC that defines message header (hmm...I'm blocking on the term that belongs here) data that provides the information needed for a mail client to "discriminate" between the real sender and the list-processor?