Caliann the Elf claimed... > David Dyer-Bennet <dd-b at dd-b.net> wrote: > As I say, the issue is with *who* should not be suffered to live. > That's clearly an example of the bible proposing violence and harm > upon an other; which Caliann says doesn't exist in the bible. > ********************************************************************** ************* > > <grumbles and sighs> Now David, where did I say that violence and harm does not exist in the Bible? Or was it ...just perhaps...that I said that there were many places in the Bible that spoke against violence and harm? <rolls her eyes> I am beginning to sympathize with congressmen that complain of being misquoted. It *scares* me to sympathize with congressmen, so will you please stop? Please? > Ah... You wrote this: > Caliann the Elf <calianng_graves at yahoo.com> writes: > > I have yet to see the Scriptures of a major religion propose > > violence and harm upon others, even those not of their religion. > > The Bible does not do so. The Quran does not do so. The Talmud > > does not do so. Not only did you say the Bible did not propose violence and harm upon others, you claimed the Talmud and the Quran were free of these proposals as well. How is insisting that a person "not be suffered to live" not a proposal of violence and harm? Perhaps you need to remember more clearly what you have typed. Baralier -- Good planning and organisation are just crutches for people who can't handle stress and caffeine. http://members.optushome.com.au/velvetspyder Costumier & Reprobate