definitely what wrote: > Gametech writes: > Whose harm? Do you *really* believe that?! > > I would entreat you, if all you're going to do is add one line, to > please trim the rest of the letter you're quoting. > > rone Sorry my statements have been horridly butchered by removal of content on others parts as several responses down the chain. The intention of my remarks are very very misconstrued often, I'd rather not do onto others what has issued more stress to me, that is when I see vast amount of content I've read before, I skip it, look for the replies to statements and can just scan back up the page to place context, *all of it* Sorry man, I must deny your request, you are as is anyone welcome however, to ignore anything I post. I will when it strikes me pay at least a small amount of attention, that is to say I will still use *my* judgment regarding respecting the intelligence of the readers on the list to not re-read parts of the entry that they do not wish to by using *their* judgment. That won't stop me from providing it without them having to look back to through the topic.