On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:08:27PM -0700, Andrew Lias <anrwlias at hotmail.com> wrote: > [Agyar] > >Heh. I agree, as well. I've not read some of > >the major authors of the genre, and the books I have > >read are generaly interesting, at least. (I'd name > >some, but the use of "genre" to denote the books > >implies that I'd prefer to not give away anything > >about Agyar, so...:) > I did get a big fan of that genre to read it. He said it was "Okay". I > was surprised, to say the least. Although I am not a big fan of the genre, > I have read a fair amount of books within it (including the classic > D______) and thought that it was an excellent example of it. <shrug> It's not, really. It's a very, very, very well written and conceived emotional bombshell, which happens to be very subtly written to match a certain type of book more usually characterized by far lesser subtlety. Most people who read that genre are not especially fans of subtlety. -- Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org) Public Key: http://matthew.infodancer.org/public_key.txt Homepage: http://matthew.infodancer.org/index.jsp Politics: http://www.triggerfinger.org/index.jsp