> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:02:28AM -0500, John Klein > <zarkon at illrepute.org> wrote: >> (I am not saying I endorse Leibniz's point of view, simply that this >> argument is not bulletproof.) >> Or there's this one: He could make a rock, then decide not to lift it. > > I've always preferred the solution that says if he makes a rock > he cannot lift, he is no longer omnipotent -- there's no going > back. > -- > Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org) Then if he uncreated the rock would he be omnipotent again? Robert