God's rocks (was: Re: Good books generally)

Tue Feb 18 08:55:56 PST 2003

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:02:28AM -0500, John Klein
> <zarkon at illrepute.org> wrote:
>> (I am not saying I endorse Leibniz's point of view, simply that this
>> argument is not bulletproof.)
>> Or there's this one: He could make a rock, then decide not to lift it.
> I've always preferred the solution that says if he makes a rock
> he cannot lift, he is no longer omnipotent -- there's no going
> back.
> --
> Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org)

Then if he uncreated the rock would he be omnipotent again?