On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:10:46PM -0500, John Klein <zarkon at illrepute.org> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Matthew Hunter wrote: > @> > (I am not saying I endorse Leibniz's point of view, simply that this > @> > argument is not bulletproof.) > @> > Or there's this one: He could make a rock, then decide not to lift it. > @> I've always preferred the solution that says if he makes a rock > @> he cannot lift, he is no longer omnipotent -- there's no going > @> back. > From the point of view of a religious scholar, though, that's not an > acceptable solution; basically, the tension arises from the following set > of statements: I'm not a religious scholar. I want a logical solution to the paradox and I don't care if God dies as a result. -- Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org) Public Key: http://matthew.infodancer.org/public_key.txt Homepage: http://matthew.infodancer.org/index.jsp Politics: http://www.triggerfinger.org/index.jsp