On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Matthew Hunter wrote: @> > @> > From the point of view of a religious scholar, though, that's not an @> > @> > acceptable solution; basically, the tension arises from the following set @> > @> > of statements: @> > @> I'm not a religious scholar. @> > @> I want a logical solution to the paradox and I don't care if God @> > @> dies as a result. @> > I am perplexed; it seems to me that the paradox only exists if you accept @> > the existance of God in the first place. @> @> Or omnipotence. Really, and you're contending that something can be omnipotent without additionally ending up being God? I'd be quite interested to see that one.