On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Warlord wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/19/2003 8:22:37 PM Eastern Standard > > Time, Philip Hart <philiph at SLAC.Stanford.EDU> writes: > > > > [attrib lost] > > >> Can anyone make sense of Kiera's subsequent comment, > > >> in _Orca_ I think it was, that Verra had said it was > > > > > >I'm almost sure the comment was in _Taltos_. > > > > The vial itself only appears in _Taltos_, but it's discussed > > in _Orca_, page 283: > > > > "And what was that whole business with the blood of the > > goddess? Not that I haven't figured out who the goddess is." > > > > "I can't tell you that, Vlad. She said it was important for > > you to have that vial, and that she, herself, didn't know > > why." > > > > [And the next three lines are one of my favorite quotes.] > > > > > > --KG > > > > Now that I think back (rolls eyes for effect, see other thread), > "blood of a goddess" is all that I remember mentioned. Naturally, > the first assumtion is Verra, but do we have confirmation on > that ? If not, well, Sethra was offered god-hood. Could the > blood be hers ? Offered but never accepted. Remember, Sethra isn't allowed to leave if she ever returns to the Paths, so her blood wouldn't help at all.