On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Casey Rousseau wrote: > David Silberstein writ: > > Some theologians don't seem to accept "omnipresence" - that is, God is > > not considered physically part of the creation. Although I may have > > misunderstood that part of things. > > Not sure on this, but I've had at least one theologian describe things the > other way around, i.e. that creation is physically part of God. this has an amusingly Kabbalistic flavor to it. well, except for the tzimtzum part. pe