On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Matthew Hunter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:04:41PM -0800, Philip Hart <philiph at SLAC.Stanford.EDU> wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Matthew Hunter wrote: > > > Didn't we just go over this? > > I think you're risking an inquiry after the health of your tapeworm here. > Not at all. "We" is the collective list body in this case. I must have missed the arrival at a consensus because I was busy deleting Monty Python and beer posts along with a certain amount of flirting. > ... > As I've noted in the past, a separate list for off-topic > discussions spawned from the original list manages to obtain the > best of both worlds. I'd be glad to set one up if there's > interest, as I have done so for other similar lists. This noting must have been before my time - was a consensus reached? Presumably for no second list and a low signal-to-noise here? Cranky because of a hangover, I'm currently tempted to ask for people to put "not off-topic" in their subject lines so I can filter on that. At least I'm using pine and "d" is placed right on the keyboard.