Dragaera

A Minor Collection of Speculations

Wed Jul 23 22:13:17 PDT 2003

The reader will be aware that the upcoming release of the modest 
work of historical fiction known to some as _Lord of Castle 
Black_, inexplicably separated into the second volume of three 
for reasons no more of interest to me than the minor natterings 
of patrons about the cost of the very paper upon which I do not 
currently write, has undoubtedly generated much interest and 
indeed averice among those readers who are aware of it; and in 
light of that interest many will have chosen to peruse the first 
portion of the complete work already in their possession as a 
means of refreshing their memory and recalling to their minds the 
events, passions, and tensions of the time to which the esteemed 
author has done the honor of transporting them.

In light of that fact and in appreciation of the synchronicity 
that finds my own person involved in such an enterprise, and not 
unmindful of the honor that accompanies such a diversity of 
personality and interest being focused even for a short period 
upon a similar matter, indeed nearly an identical one (albeit 
such a claim not taking into account minor variations of 
printing), I have taken it upon myself, unworthy though I may be, 
to share some of the additional nuances and kernels of that which 
I will call, to be brief, "Paarfi-truth", in order to necessarily 
distinguish it from that which we call truth in the normal course 
of our lives and indeed the normal course of history.

For it cannot be denied that the esteemed author Paarfi has 
expressed the sentiment that these notebooks, which we have had 
occasion to peruse due to the services of the reknowned Brust 
himself and the generous operations of Glorious Mountain Press, 
by which I mean what may be more familiarly known as Tor, are in 
fact a work if not of fiction than perhaps one in the form of a 
notebook or workbook detailing a minor portion of history in 
order to faciliate the construction of a much larger and even 
more impressive, though presently insubstantial, work.

As such we must wonder whether events, as described in these 
notebooks, bear the relation to absolute fact that the events 
depicted in the much larger work, after all necessary research 
was in fact completed, would have demonstrated.  Indeed, certain 
commentators have brought to light a small number of supposed 
contradictions between the notebooks of Paarfi, a noted 
historian, and the autobiographical ramblings of one "Vlad 
Taltos", a Jhereg of questionable means and even more 
questionable morality, and by his own admission one who would 
refuse an honorable duel in favor of a knife in an alleyway.

In my effort to understand and resolve these discrepencies, 
without meaning to imply or create any manner of blemish upon
either the noted historian or the, ah, surely quite tolerant 
assassin, and in making use of the noted analogies to the works 
of one Dumas, likewise a publisher of historical accounts drawn 
>from notebooks, whose existance I have chosen for the sake of 
brevity neither to question nor impugn, I have come to the 
following conclusions:

1) In that the character of Milady in Dumas did not exist in the 
original source works; 

2) In that the character role of antagonist within the framework
of _The Pheonix Guards_ is filled by an analogy of Milady, whom I 
shall refer to as Milord;

3) In that the character role of antagonist within the framework 
of _20 years after_ is taken by "Son of Milady";

4) In that the character role of antagonist within the framework
of _500 Years After_ is taken by a character whom speculation 
indicates could plausibly be described as "Daughter of Milord";

5) As the role of antagonist for the heroes in _The Paths of the 
Dead_ is filled by a character named Orlaan;

6) As the actions of this Orlaan demonstrate a congruence with
the character previously known as Grita, aka Daughter of Milord;

7) As the actions, possessions, and a certain coincidence of 
names imply a congruence with a particular Athyra wizard who
shall go unnamed, but who takes a prominent role in the 
adventures of one "Vlad Taltos";

8) As the unnamed character is gyaself a powerful wizard,
worthy of a certain amount of respect and wariness;

10) And as the unnamed character might well have objected to his 
portrayal as a villian;

11) As the dramatic nature of the works provides an opportunity 
for a certain symmetry of gender; that is,

12) That the character of Milady is taken by one Milord; 

13) and the character of Son of Milady is taken by one 
Daughter of Milord;

14) and that the interests of continuity demand a shared 
antagonist;

15) I conclude that the character of Grita, aka Daughter of 
Milord, and indeed the character of Milord as well, are 
fictional; that is, inserted by the author or translator for 
dramatic effect and to impose a sense of unified opposition and
generate tension within the framework of the more limited 
perspective offered by these minor notebooks when considered 
along rather than as part of the completed work;

16) I further conclude that the character of Orlaan was adapted 
>from the historical character who shall remain unnamed despite 
rumors of his demise;

17) And finally, I conclude that the purpose of this adaptation
was to provide dramatic continuity from the original two works,
while being a transparent strategam to evade criticism from less 
popular historians who would prefer the strict confines of actual 
events in the safe obscurity of their papers, whereas a more 
publically known figure must by necessity be more circumspect in 
his treatment of the powerful.  

In summary, the character of Grita never existed, but was 
inserted by Paarfi as a dramatic device.  The character of 
Loraan, whom we encounter while following Vlad, fills the 
historical role of Orlaan, and while Paarfi is aware of this, he 
chooses (perhaps for reasons suggesting a most personal fear for
his safety) to alter the gender and name of the character in 
order to provide a continuing role for his fictional antagonist 
Grita.

I like this explanation much better than "Ooops".  Of course, the 
next book out may very well demolish the whole theory.

-- 
Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org)
Public Key: http://matthew.infodancer.org/public_key.txt
Homepage: http://matthew.infodancer.org/index.jsp
Politics: http://www.triggerfinger.org/index.jsp