I was thinking about that myself - I don't know which would be harder, filling 3000 words, or keeping it to /just/ 3000 words. This is the place where it would be great to have a personal anedote to share with the world if you had one. That works great for those that Con-ned with Roger but poses a greater problem for all the rest who knew him only through his writings. johne (phy) cook wisconsin, usa blog: http://breezeway.blogspot.com forum: http://forum.instagiber.com/index.php?h=1&pf=268 stormfort list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stormfort/ >From: Randi128 at aol.com >To: dragaera at dragaera.info >Subject: Re: 3000 words on Roger Zelazny >Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:16:57 EDT > >on 7/24/03 bio_phy at hotmail.com wrote: >-While this appears to be daunting, I think SKZB has a better shot than >most >at pulling this off (with apologies to Gaiman). > >SKZB will do a fine job, but I believe, as I know others do, that Neil >would >do a fine job also. What is important here is the honor of being asked to >do >it. I also believe that the hardest part of the task is not actually >listing >his numerous accomplishments, but expressing the gratitude of the science >fiction/fantasy community in a way that doesn't sound sappy. > >John D. Barbato, OD _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus