lazarus said: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:03:36 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: >>--- Steve Hubbell <usagigoya at hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >From: Gaertk at aol.com on Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:16:27 -0400 >>> > >>> >Some criticisms: my copy wasn't glued cleanly, and there >>> >were of course some typos (sorry, I didn't note where). I >>> >did however note a couple places where the dialogue gets >>> >somewhat confused, if not outright misattributed: pages 81 >>> >and 336. >>> > >>> 1) My copy had the glue/binding problem as well... >>> unnoticeable, except when >>> reading... >> >> Oh, good, I feel somewhat better knowing I'm not the >>only one with a shoddy copy. >> > > Make that three. But it wasn't too bad. I've gotten much worse. At > least the binding is staying on. > > And the content more than makes up for it. My question, albeit a petty one: Why in Verra's name is the fabric cover of the book BABY BLUE? Why not a tasteful dark color like the others? I am always sure to wash and completely dry my hands before reading, as I take off the dust cover while reading to preserve it better, but with humidity, etc, it's nigh impossible to keep the light blue fabric cover clean from marks. Yes, it's silly, but it's also incongruent with the other books. Why baby blue? -Rick