If it absolutely *must* be a word, shouldn't it also assume the inclusion of "bada-boom"? johne (phy) cook wisconsin, usa personal blog: http://breezeway.blogspot.com aerie blog: http://aeriepress.blogspot.com/ stormfort list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stormfort/ >From: "Michele Riccio" <mr1 at rcosta.com> >Reply-To: "Michele Riccio" <mr1 at rcosta.com> >To: dragaera at dragaera.info >Subject: Re: OT: Signs of the Endtimes... (Fwd) >Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:59:26 -0400 > >On 21 Aug 2003 at 9:52, Chris Olson - SunPS wrote > > > ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- > > > > It is truly the signs of the endtimes. The latest list of > > additions to the Oxford English Dictonary have just been released. > > Among them there is one that surly cannot be deemed anything but a > > sign that it is long past for the great old ones to rise up and devour > > humanity. Added to the dictionary this year is: > > > > > > Bootylicious > >"Bada Bing" also made the cut. Who chooses these words - and, to >go all tangential, can "bada bing" even be considered a word? > >MMichele Riccio _________________________________________________________________ <b>MSN 8:</b> Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup