On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, lazarus wrote: >On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:33:14 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: > >> >>This page: >> >> http://www.mojoworld.net/sil/ref/books.html >> >>States that: >> >> Dzurlord is really only noteable for the introduction written by >> Steven Brust. The rest of the text is not his direct work. This >> book is out of print but you can read the introduction here. >> >>(where "here" is a link to the following page:) >> >> http://www.mojoworld.net/sil/treats/dzurlordintro.html > >Also, Steve recently said that the intro isn't canonical, IIRC. > > No, he said : ] Well, not having established the canon, I don't think it's fair for ] me to say. I never said that bits and pieces of Jarhead and Yentil ] were not canonical. ] Myself, I tend to prefer to see artillery used to support infantry ] action, but it really depends on the technology of the field piece ] in question. Which is only slightly better than "Tee hee" in terms of its information content. Bah. I nearly think he is indulging his famous tendency towards being deliberately obfuscatory.