Dragaera

Fwd: Kelly's Movement

Mon Jan 19 13:41:45 PST 2004

Jeepers. When will I remember to check the reply-to field correctly?

On Jan 19, 2004, at 4:12 PM, David Silberstein wrote:

> ...
> None of these activities would have brought his group into conflict
> directly with the Empire *yet* - but the Jhereg Organization sees the
> latter sort of activities as being a direct threat to their income.
> So it is in their interest to *force* Kelly into conflict with the
> Empire - and Kelly is not averse to this, perhaps because, as a
> matter of principle, he wants to demonstrate that an effective group
> of organized Teckla and Easterners *can* resist the Empire.

I would note that, looked at this way, Kelly's movement, even if a 
raving
success, is actually not a threat to the Empire or the Cycle - and 
doesn't
ever have to be - IF the Empire is willing to adapt its power structure.

I can see, however,  a) the Empire not being willing to or b) certain
parties being happy to make the movement _appear_ to be more of a
direct threat, and thus force the issue, or, most likely c) both. But 
even
House Jhereg  _could_ re-Organize if the Empire moved that way.

It would take quite an individual, or a rare group - indeed the stuff of
legends - to turn Kelly's proto-revolution into a Dragaeran governmental
renaissance without causing a major conflagration (heck, even _with_
the major conflagration). Where, oh where, could we find one of those?


Being Zero Man    (Noam Izenberg's nighttime superhero avocation)