At 04:18 PM 2/14/2004, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: >Paul Echeverri <gomi at pollywog.com> writes: > > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:24:02 -0500, Peter H. Granzeau > > <pgranzeau at cox.net> wrote: > > > >> Please explain. I don't understand what this means. I use Eudora. > > > > Ah. > > > > For some reason, preserving the 'functionality' of reply-to:all, so > > that one gets duplicates of all messages (since reply-to:all sends to > > both the list and the individual), is considered the Correct Way. It's > > really best not to worry about it, grit your teeth, and hand-write the > > headers every single freaking time you reply, so as to make it behave > > properly. > >Or use a mail program that supports the RFC 2369 header fields for >mailing list commands, or one that supports "reply to recipient", or Do you know of a website that compares various e-mail programs and features? Particularly whether the client supports "this RFC" and "that RFC" ? Such a site would be helpful in selecting a e-mail client.