Dragaera

Question for THE Steven

Mark A Mandel mam at theworld.com
Thu Feb 19 14:39:17 PST 2004

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Jerry Friedman wrote:

#
#--- Kenneth Stone <knots4kcs at yahoo.com> wrote:
#> > > This thought occurred to me as well, so I was
#> > *very* interested,
#> > > not to mentioned surprised, when I found out she
#> > did not know
#> > > about spellbreaker, because that means THE task(s)
#> > she has in
#> > > mind for him is unrelated. This intrigues.
#> >
#> > It doesn't necessarily mean that.  She may have just
#> > not known that
#> > the destiny she knows about, or the task she has in
#> > mind, is related
#> > to Spellbreaker.  It is still interesting, though.
#>
#> What makes you (anybody) think that she doesn't
#> know?
#
#ISTR that she's surprised when she first sees it, which must
#be in _Taltos_.  I suppose she could just be surprised that
#Vlad has it *already*.  Or she could have not put two and two
#together, or she could be acting.  (It strikes as very likely,
#though not certain, that she's acting later in _Taltos_, during
#the discussion of who's going to leave the Paths.)

Or she knew he was going to get a GW but didn't know more than that. And
the connection of Spellbreaker to Gs *was* a weird one. (As if we had
some idea of what's normal for a GW.)

But even if there's no fate, destiny, prophecy, etc., involved, or if
there is but Verra doesn't know about it, influence over that
reincarnated soul still looks like a good bet for her.

-- Mark A. Mandel
   http://cracksandshards.com
   a Steven Brust Dragaera fan website