Okay, we have to draw the line somewhere. From this angle, these posts have no point. Really, this whole arc of discussion should be circumscribed. Perhaps if we table this topic, we could excel in literary critique instead of continuing to spread sheet... Mia McDavid <mia_mcdavid at comcast.net> wrote: __________ >You guys give me an acute pain. Must you be so obtuse??? > >Kenneth Gorelick wrote: > >> >> On Mar 12, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Warlord wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Kenneth Gorelick [mailto:pulmon at comcast.net] >>>> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 11:18 AM >>>> To: Warlord >>>> Cc: dragaera at dragaera.info >>>> Subject: Re: Off topic question for Dr Whom >>>> >>>> >>>> <sinp> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Anyone who considers arithmatical methods of producing random >>>>> digits is, of course, in a state of sin." -- John Von Neumann >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Does that make an accomplice of such a person a cosin-er? >>>> >>> >>> Quit trying to go off on a tangent. >>> >>> W >>> >>> 2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2. >>> >>> >> That may be a sinh for you, yyy-guy >> >> >