> Andrew Jones <chaosasj at bellsouth.net> writes: > > > Philip Hart wrote: > > > >> > >> Isn't it "typos"? > > > Yes, yes it is. It also begs the question: Why didn't the editor pick > > up the typos? > > Same reason as for any other book; plus some extra for the complexity > of Paarfi's prose. I don't recall that I've ever read a book without > noticing a few typos. > -- Look at it this way. Lord of the Rings is probably the most read fantasy epic of all time (or at least pretty darned close). In the 70's, I think they were *still* chasing down typos. Then every time you go to the printer with a new edition even more typos get introduced. Envy not the editor. andy christensen