Dragaera

proofreading

Tue Apr 27 12:25:29 PDT 2004

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:53:06PM -0400, Casey Rousseau wrote:

> MJ replied:

> > Actually, I was thinking of CFSB&G, and _Teckla_. . . .
> 
> Ah.  I like _Teckla_ too, but I get the feeling that lotsa folks get
> squeamish about the politics.  Those who don't are likely to be upset
> that our hero is losing his gal.  Kick, smack, hug away.  I like the
> central role Noish-pa has in this and Pheonix.  Teckla makes Vlad much
> more human, less high and mighty.  Gee, I wonder why? :)

It's funny, I don't agree a bit with Kelly & crews politics, but I
absolutely agree that the Teckla are getting the raw end of the stick -
and will continue to get the raw end of the stick until they stand up
on their hind legs and do something about it.  Until I got it thru my
thick head that Kelly really was planning a Marxist revolution, I thought
that the story was going to go the way of so many other revolutions --
desperate people will follow anyone who promises them relief, but then
find that they've exchanged one bad situation for another.  And no,
I don't care to argue the merits of Marxism, Trotskyism, and whether
or not Kelly would have built a good implementation of same or even
if such is possible.  I'm merely saying that the politics didn't bug
me first time through because I thought they were going to be irrelevant
in the end.

The collapse of Vlad and Cawtis marriage is well-foreshadowed and
executed with the inevitability of a landslide; both need to come
a long way if they're ever to repair things.  I'm betting they don't,
tho on a purely personal basis I'd like to see them become civil -
if only for Noish-pa and Vlad Norathars sake.

A couple of years ago I wrote up my opinion on the whole thing; it's
in the archive at <http://dragaera.info/mailinglists/archive.cgi/1/2362>.
Reading it over, I still stand by it.
-- 
"Offense thieves -- they take it when it isn't offered."
	-- another definition by Tom Digby