J C wrote: > > Mario is Mario. Steve's said he's no one else. He's also said he's > someone we know. We know who Mario is. He's Mario. I completely agree with you (and have previous posts to prove it). So does Steve. But there is an inevitability to the Mario discussion making its appearance on the list. It's very cyclical. Kinda like the spoiler space discussion. Or the reply-to munging discussion. Or the listserv vs. Yahoo group vs. some other alternative discussion. And wait until the religion thread gets kick-started again; though that one isn't one of the cyclical threads, it certainly was epic... Help! We're stuck in a David Eddings-plotted mailing list, doomed to repeat history (and posts) until some cataclysmic event (a new book being published) can end the Cycle. Uh, I mean cycle. *grin* Jose, who probably should get sleep, as his posts appear to be getting decidedly silly. And now he's referring to himself in the third person. -- Jose Marquez \ Cthulhu 2004 jhereg69 at hackwater.com \ Why vote for http://www.hackwater.com \ the lesser evil?