On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Philip Hart wrote: >FWIW, my recent post containing a line or two of text and a couple >of URLs provoked a no-spam response as well. > Interesting. My e-mail with the full text of the filk that Mark posted appears not to have bounced. Looking at your post, I note it contained the word "gross" in the numerical sense, but it might also be a keyword the the spam filter checks for, *in addition* to whether the mail contains URLs or not. Hmm. Experimenting a bit more: You will most certainly *not* find a sexy, blond bimbo, or even anything particularly gross, if you follow this here link: http://dragaera.info/mailinglists/archive.cgi/1/979 Or even this one: http://www.engadget.com/entry/1499629174117153/