On Mon, 2 May 2005, Mark A. Mandel wrote: @> --- Scott Schultz <scott at cjhunter.com> wrote: @> > This includes the unusual circumstance of there @> > being two sequential Phoenix emperors instead of the more usual single @> > Phoenix emperor. @> @> Do we know that? I don't think so. The issue of whether there may be multiple emperors from the same house in the same slice of the cycle has yet to be settled. (Although one imagines that there are multiple people involved in governing the Teckla Republic.) I believe we've gone round and round a few times on this one; final determination will have to wait for evidence from the Canon, assuming it ever gets fired in that direction. Which isn't to say that seeing another set of arguments for and against wouldn't be entertaining.