Re Re: A priority queue & A nice ADT packaging style

Davdi Silverrock davdisil at gmail.com
Sun Dec 11 22:52:05 PST 2005

On 12/11/05, Maximilian Wilson <wilson.max at gmail.com> wrote:

> Have you played around with Gump? The CTM book suggests in several places
> that sufficiently-common idioms be given linguistic support, and I've heard
> people on this list suggest that e.g. some kinds of operator overloading
> (arithmetic on imaginary numbers) are best done with Gump rather than
> extending Oz itself, but I've never gotten deep enough into Gump to figure
> out how to do it.

I've been trying to figure out a good response to this, and the best I
can come up with are:

"Stack overflow:  I don't think we're in Kanas anymore."
"Parse error, which crushed under house."