On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Davdi Silverrock wrote: > On 1/31/06, Philip Hart <philiph at slac.stanford.edu> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Davdi Silverrock wrote: > > > > > On 1/31/06, Jon_Lincicum at stream.com wrote: > > > > > > > > Stephen Shafer wrote: > > > > > > > > > >Why would a witch want to create amorphia even if he or she could? (since > > > > >witchcraft does not use the stuff, nor, as far as we know, does it allow > > > > >for the control of amophia.) > > > > > > > > Maybe if that witch happened to also *be* an elder sorcerer? > > > > > > > > > > Sudden pararectal notion: Perhaps that is what Verra meant by her > > > response of "We shall see" > > > > Noted earlier in the discussion, I think... > > It is true that your noting is why I had it in mind to connect to the > witch+elder sorceror idea. However, you did not expand upon merely > noting it. But credit where due: > > "Based upon an observation made by Philip Hart". One more such credit and I am ruined. Once I expanded, but now my function here is just to note. Oh, and to disagree.