Scott Schultz wrote: >It's easy to get into the mind-set that everyone here has read all of SKZ's >books. Not true, though. For instance, I've never read Agyar, though I've >been familiar with "the twist" for quite a long time now thanks to spoilers >on the list. I'm not resentful of it, mind, but I can say that knowing it >ahead of time has probably contributed to my having not bothered to pick up >the book. > >I'd say that any time there's a chance of something being a spoiler, that >the safe thing to do is to assume that it is. > > I don't see that it's a spoiler, at least not the kind that we read the whole book to discover.