>1. Have you accidentally sent a private reply instead of posting to > the list? Once. First post I made. It was kind of unexpected, so next time I checked the "To" headers in my reply and got it all straightened out. >1'. Have you accidentally posted to the list instead of sending a > private reply? The way this list is set up, that would take effort. (I consider this a Good Thing, having accidentally posted to other lists.) >2. Have you received an accidental private reply that was meant to go > to the list? Nope. But then, I'm new, and staying out of the religion debate. >3. When you get a message that was sent to you instead of the list, do > you feel obliged to query the sender to ask him or her if it was > meant to private instead of to the list? No. I assume that other people are smarter than me, or at least have been around longer than me and know how things work. >4. Has the Reply-To behavior of this list caused you confusion when > posting to other mailing lists, perhaps even causing you to > accidentally send a private e-mail instead of posting or vice > versa? Nope. >5. How do you feel about the Reply-To behavior of this list? > Do you > + like it I'm a fan, but Eudora allows me to "Reply to all" and delete the sender's address so that it goes to the list. I've not seen a "Reply-to-list" list where "Reply to all" will catch both the sender and the list addresses. (Of course, having said that, I nearly sent this off-list.) ---- The time for action is past-- now is the time for senseless bickering! --Ashleigh Brilliant