> -----Original Message----- > From: Gaertk at aol.com [mailto:Gaertk at aol.com] > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 6:44 PM > To: Davis, Iain E.; dragaera at dragaera.info > Subject: RE: Straw Poll about "Reply-to" > > > In a message dated 11/29/2002 6:59:33 PM Eastern Standard > Time, "Davis, Iain E." <feaelin at kemenel.org> writes: > > I (gaertk at aol.com) wrote: > > >> 6. Do you receive multiple copies of posts because the > >> sended replied to all and didn't trim? > >> > >> Yes. > > > > Note that this is a different #6 from David's #6, > > potentiallly confusing. > > Actually, this is my #6 (Mia already apologised for > misattributing her post). Oops. Make that KG's #6. :) Apologies for adding to the confusion. ;) > > Strangely, I've not experienced this. > > Ironically, I can tell from the headers that Mia just got > two copies of your post. And just to show you what it looks > like, I didn't trim your address. Oddly, I still didn't receive two copies. It may have to do with the way I have my mail-sorting filters setup, OR, since I use my work's corporately managed mail system, it's possible the duplicate was intercepted at the higher level. As an aside, I suspect one of the reasons David doesn't have a problem with this particular issue, is because if you're not on his "list of people that aren't spammers", messages addressed directly to him get held, and you get annoying messages in your inbox about it. :)