Straw Poll about Reply-to

Davis, Iain E. said:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rick Castello [mailto:rick at 404.978.org]
>> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 2:40 PM
>> To: dragaera at dragaera.info
>> Subject: RE: Straw Poll about Reply-to
>
>>      <PLUG>
>>        I'm the project lead for the SquirrelMail webmail project, and
>> we've specifically designed it to work properly for
>>        mailing lists, providing links for "reply to sender",
>>        "reply to list", and even links to get list info and
>>        unsubscribe from properly configured (according to RFCs)
>>        mailing lists... all from a single message sent to that
>>        list.
>
>
> Ah.. So your position on this matter is influenced by your desire to
> promote your product. :)

     Perhaps I should have clarified.

     SquirrelMail is FREE, open source, and I make not one cent from
     its use or not, nor do ANY of the members of the development team.
     We do it because we care.

     Personally, I don't care *what* client you use, as long as it isn't
     a broken one.  I'm promoting RFC compliance, not my project.

> Many Many people out there are not _rich_ enough to have control over
> what e-mail client they can use, either because they use a public free
> service locally, or have other restrictions (often work-related).  Your
> assertions that people should "select a better e-mail client" is elitest
> at best, and discriminatory, at worst.

     Elitist?  Discriminatory?

     Them's fightin' words.  :)

     There are public free services that aren't borked.  Rich has nothing
     to do with it, and your personal attack merely clouds the matter,
     adding nothing to the discussion.

     Your claims are unfounded, and rude.  I discussed the merits of
     compliant mail tools.  Where was I beling elitist?

     -Rick