David Dyer-Bennet writes: Looks like you're trying to construct a scenario where *nothing* could *ever* be blamed on the religion itself. I find that an unacceptable outcome -- there must be at least a theoretical possibility. Why, exactly, MUST there be such a theoretical possibility? > Frankly, all you're showing here is prejudice, which you justify by > saying, hey, i've had religion thrown in my face for almost 50 years, > so it's OK for me to lower myself to their level. And i think you > should be above that sort of stuff, as the "thinking" sort of fellow > you claim to be. Thank you for your thoughtful and perceptive input on this issue. You're welcome. rone -- New from the makers of Li'l Swimmers: Li'l Eaters. Edible underwear that looks just like Mommy's and Daddy's! - Kibo