At 16:25 12/08/2002 -0600, Gametech wrote: >I think Paarfi isn't meant to be interpreted as 'Cannon' the major events >are true but the details between are guesses, disseminated information, >hearsay, embellishments and fiction (I think). Vlad I don't think is lying, >I think he fully believes the misinformation he has, or at least treats it >as "I have some reason to believe it is this way". That of course is just my >opinion. If Paarfi is "Cannon", he's a loose one. ;^) (You meant "canon", I believe.) -- Regards, Pete pgranzeau at cox.net