Peter H. Granzeau wrote: > At 16:25 12/08/2002 -0600, Gametech wrote: > >> I think Paarfi isn't meant to be interpreted as 'Cannon' the major >> events are true but the details between are guesses, disseminated >> information, hearsay, embellishments and fiction (I think). Vlad I >> don't think is lying, I think he fully believes the misinformation >> he has, or at least treats it as "I have some reason to believe it >> is this way". That of course is just my opinion. > > If Paarfi is "Cannon", he's a loose one. ;^) > > (You meant "canon", I believe.) Clearly.