Dragaera

Brust books you didn't like (was: Where did you begin?)

Fri Dec 20 07:53:14 PST 2002

>Time for my $.02.  In fact, I was unable to get into To Reign in Hell--it 
>had *athiest* written all over it, and as such, failed to gain my interest 
>or sympathy.

I'm genuinely sorry to hear that.  As it happens, I am an atheist, but I 
hate to think of some of the books that I would have missed out if I avoided 
books that, for instance, depicted Christian themes in a positive light 
(e.g., C.S. Lewis' _The Great Divorce_, which is one of my favorite 
stories).

For that matter, I can think of a lot of books that I would have missed 
reading if I were applying ideological filters to my selections.  Ken 
McKleod's books, for instance, tend to take the stance that Communism is a 
viable ideology -- a view which I find vastly implausible -- but the stories 
are just so darned good that I can accept that as just an axiomatic aspect 
of his fictional universes.  Likewise, Heinlein's politics annoy the hell 
out of my more than half of the time, but I still find his stories 
interesting and thought provoking.  Sheri Tepper's books are chock full of 
radical-feminist theories and contentions, but I would be diminished were I 
were to have never read them.  I could go on.

I think that I would lose something if I were to avoid artistic works simply 
because they contain views and opinions that don't mesh with my own.  
Indeed, I think that to do so, to be frank, would be an indication that my 
own convictions wern't very strong, or stable, in the first place.  Any view 
that can only survive in a carefully circumscibed shelter isn't one, I 
think, that is worth holding.

Or so I think.

-- Andrew Lias



_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU= 
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_addphotos_3mf