--- Mark A Mandel <mam at theworld.com> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Andrew McGuigan wrote: > > #SPOILER SPACE > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #> > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #> > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #I *still* think Arra is Devera. > > But she doesn't behave anything LIKE the way we've > seen Devera behave, > at least when in human (yeah, yeah) form. She's > always appeared, AFAWK, > as a little girl and acted like one, though an > extraordinary one. Arra > takes some pleasure in sexually embarrassing ... > Uncle 'Rollan? Come ON! Yes, we've always seen her as a little girl, and she's behaved like a little girl. Now, perhaps, she is appearing as a young woman, and acting, perhaps, like a young woman, which includes embarassing men, even relatives. > > None of which proves, of course, that Steve isn't > doing new and > different things with Devera to play games with our > heads. But IMHO it > leaves this putative identification marked "unproved > and very unlikely". Considering that Steve is so aware of us that he is mentioning us in his acknowledgements, and he knows how much fun we find in "hunting" Devera, I would think he would try to mix it up. I mean, how much fun would it have been for Devera to show up, say at Whitecrest manor applying for the job of kitchen girl? Andrew