Good books generally (was: Literary Disappointments)

Tue Feb 18 10:50:08 PST 2003

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Warlord wrote:

@> As one side of an argument (Steve, *stop* rubbing your hands together
@> like that), I would postulate that if those reading your words receive
@> their meaning as it was intended to be received, then the method of
@> of that communication is inconsequential.

That's one hell of a big if, particularly if you decide to use punctuation
and grammar in non-standard ways.

(Ignoring the fact that the style of writing itself transmits additional data.)