Athyra (no Chapter 9+ spoilers) and Dragon

Tue Jun 3 03:55:52 PDT 2003

On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Iválawyerly Rebollo wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Philip Hart wrote:
> >
> >This was discussed recently.  The lawyerly answer...
> >
> >The authoritative (literally) answer: Vlad doesn't feel like getting into
> >a long discussion about his history with a Dragraeran/Teckla/child.
> Sincerelly, I prefer the first one. I think he explains many things to Savn
> but does not care to stop explanations when he wants.

Not sure if you're actually disagreeing with SKZB, but if you feel
strongly about the (now correctly spelled - should have gone with
"physicistly" anyway) first option, and you're not finished reading the
book, you can probably still take it back, get a refund, and send that
refund to my paypal account...