On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Iválawyerly Rebollo wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Philip Hart wrote: > > > >This was discussed recently. The lawyerly answer... > > > >The authoritative (literally) answer: Vlad doesn't feel like getting into > >a long discussion about his history with a Dragraeran/Teckla/child. > > Sincerelly, I prefer the first one. I think he explains many things to Savn > but does not care to stop explanations when he wants. Not sure if you're actually disagreeing with SKZB, but if you feel strongly about the (now correctly spelled - should have gone with "physicistly" anyway) first option, and you're not finished reading the book, you can probably still take it back, get a refund, and send that refund to my paypal account...