On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Derrill 'Kisc' Guilbert wrote: > I am having a real problem with this list... is there any chance that > "reply-to" can be set so it goes back to the list by default? > > Because otherwise I'm going to start looking REALLY foolish. > > Anyway, here is the response that I sent back to him TWICE before managing > to get it to the list. In the interest of saving time, pretend you've already received 10 or so condescending 'LOL U SUK AT TEH INTERNET, READ TEH HEADERS DUM DUM HEAD, OUR WAY IS BETTAR' replies, which is more or less what happened last time this was brought up. pe