I use Hotmail so that this activity doesn't go through my company's e-mail servers. As such, I'm left with Reply and Reply To All buttons. I Reply To All and then manually remove the original poster's e-mail address so the list gets the reply (and the original poster gets only one copy of it). I consider that a marginally awkward solution, but this is a relatively low traffice e-mail list and I don't mind following basic discussion list e-mail posting etiquette. In short, it's no biggie. johne (phy) cook wisconsin, usa blog: http://breezeway.blogspot.com forum: http://forum.instagiber.com/index.php?h=1&pf=268 stormfort list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stormfort/ >From: "Rick Castello" <rick at 404.978.org> >Reply-To: rick at 404.978.org >To: <dragaera at dragaera.info> >Subject: Re: while cursing amazon re the non-release of _TLoCB_ >Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:20:29 -0400 (EDT) > > > Philip Hart <philiph at SLAC.Stanford.EDU> writes: > > > >>On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, David Silberstein wrote: > >> > >>> [Aside: Could you please edit your "To:" & "Cc:" such that > >>> your replies only go to the list (or to me, but not both, > >>> since I only need one copy)? Thanks.] > >> > >> Aside - since it's less work for the receiver to delete a > >> double email than for the sender edit the cc/to (under > >> pine, anyway), I don't care about receiving extras, but > >> will honor your request - do others care? > > Most enlightened mailers offer a "reply to sender" or > "reply to list" feature, rather than just hitting "reply > all" to everything. > > Learning this habit has kept me from sending many messages > to inappropriate places, and I highly reccommend it. > > -Rick > > > _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail