On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:22:42PM -0400, Alexx S Kay <alexx at TheWorld.com> wrote: > > That and the fact that Steven got Fabio to pose for the cover. > Don't blame the author for what the cover artist did. Authors > almost never have any input into this process, and are quite often > appalled at the results. Agreed. > Also, remember that the job of a book > cover is *not* to accurately represent anything about the contents; > it's job is to help sell the book. Ah, but what few realize is that GOOD ART will help sell the book a lot better than bad art. The downside is that good art takes a long time. For instance, I doubt anyone would dispute that the cover art of Michael Whelan is far-and-away the best stuff out there. But if you want him to do your book cover, you send him the book (when YOU are done with it, mind) and he'll get back to you in a year or so. At least, so I've heard. > [Not that I have any particular complaints about this individual > cover myself; this is just a recurring argument.] There are a lot of worse covers than LoCB. I could argue with the quality of the cover art a bit in technical terms (it's too obviously a painting, for example -- this would have been amusing if Steve had put a "Morrolan gets his portrait painted" scene in the book), but in terms of what it's portraying, I have no complaints. It's the classic Conan/Elric pose, and that's exactly the type of character that Morrolan is supposed to represent. -- Matthew Hunter (matthew at infodancer.org) Public Key: http://matthew.infodancer.org/public_key.txt Homepage: http://matthew.infodancer.org/index.jsp Politics: http://www.triggerfinger.org/index.jsp