David Silberstein writes: On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, lazarus wrote: >Also, Steve recently said that the intro isn't canonical, IIRC. No, he said : ] Well, not having established the canon, I don't think it's fair for ] me to say. I never said that bits and pieces of Jarhead and Yentil ] were not canonical. ] Myself, I tend to prefer to see artillery used to support infantry ] action, but it really depends on the technology of the field piece ] in question. Before that message, he did say: ] At 08:05 PM 8/18/2003 -0700, Hans Schweitzer wrote: ] >That introduction was informative. ]Not, however, canonical, as far as I know. rone -- "I don't even know you. What if you're a psycho?" "Would a psycho waste the last of his triple-sec?" -- RICHH