"Warlord" <warlord at dragon.com> writes: > Good points. I'll go along with being an injured party grants > you certain rights to criticize. But then, you paid for that > priviledge. Steve, for example, has the right to criticize > any artwork that he (or through Tor) contracts. > > As far as the difference between a comment and criticism, I > fall back on example: > > Comment: I like (or dislike) that piece of art work. I think > it would look better with more lighter hues. > > Criticism: That sucks, and the artist should stick to cartoons. Hmmm; I'd call the first criticism, and the second "attack". And an explicit attack on the creator as well as on the work. Anyway I agree that the second doesn't serve much purpose. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <dd-b at dd-b.net>, <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <noguns-nomoney.com> <www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera mailing lists: <dragaera.info/>