On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Noam Izenberg wrote: > >One could argue that another human was at least partially >responsible for the Disaster, and thus the destruction, or at >least disruption, of the Cycle. > >- Unless Mario is not human (Don't we only have Vlad's assertions >as evidence that he is?). Er. Human in which sense? You perceive, it is confusing to use that particular term, since both Dragaerans and Easterners call themselves "human". We have Paarfi of Roundwood's history, which firmly describes Mario as being a Jhereg, which is to say, a Dragaeran Jhereg. We know that Mario is defintely a Dragaeran, because he is little more than 100 years old (FHYA, chapter 19) and is still considered very young.