Dragaera

Mailing List Etiquette

Chris Olson - SunPS Chrisf.Olson at Sun.COM
Tue Feb 10 16:00:36 PST 2004

> I watched this list for about a month after joining before I posted my first
> message, trying to get a feel for the local etiquette.

Ah, I see you are already practicing proper list etiquette.
Hmm... maybe some will rub off on me....:)

> I have a few questions, if anyone cares to share an opinion:

An opinion?  On this list? <grin>

> 1. When I reply to a message on this list, should I be replying to both the
> user and the mailing list, or just the list?  I realize when I only want to
> reply to the user, but I'm talking about when I want my reply posted back to
> the list.

I try to remember to delete the name of the person I'm replying
to, but often don't.  I don't think it's that big of a deal,
personally.  I get doubles sometimes, and just delete them.
One more email to delete out of the tens or hundreds I delete/move
anyway isn't something to harp about. (Hey, ya said ya wanted opinions!:)

> 2. I recently sent in a couple of very large messages; they were large
> because they were attempts to "deduce" the geography of Dragaera by using a
> lot of text quotes from the novels, and explaining my subsequent deductions
> as clearly as possible without, hopefully, being pedantic.  Should I limit
> my posts to a certain size (ie, break up long posts into shorter ones)?
> This is an important question, as I am preparing to post more such
> "geographical deductions"...

Not sure about this one.  I don't much care about the size,
and there's always the chance that I'll get "Geographical deductions #2"
before "#1" if it's broken up, so I'd just post one message.  If
it's really long, I'll print it out and read it on my break, if I
want to (though I'll admit this is not possible for many...:).

> 3. What is the proper way to refer to the author we're here for?  I've been
> using "Mr. Brust", but I've seen "Steve" used quite a few times.  I don't
> know the man, so I'm not entirely comfortable assuming it's okay to refer to
> him by his first-name (in the third-person, even).  Has he previously
> expressed a preference?

Well, I believe there are actually a couple of Steves on this list,
so it's nice to refer to the correct one--but then, I judge by the
context of the email.  I believe Steven Brust goes by Steve or Steven,
and doesn't mind being referred to by either, even if some of us do
put him on a pedestal and feel the term "God" doesn't quite do him
justice....:)  Of course, then he tosses in one of his little "treats",
and then I'm inclined to call him a Rat Bastard<tm>, but it's
meant in the best possible way (as a member of Rat Bastards of America
myself:).

Never call him late for a good Hungarian dinner, though.

:0
Chris

"Blind man's night is music to the deaf, and 
everyone has *two* paths, not one, whence comes
tragedy and comedy, forsooth and damn straight,
son."
 - "The Gypsy" - Brust & Lindholm